This worth reprinting from Collective Shout’s site. This campaign isn’t about health, it’s about employing sexist advertising to flog a diet product.

Keep Australia Beautiful: trash sexist ad campaigns

Collective Shout supporters have alerted us to this outdoor advertisement for a diet product. The ad urges us to ‘Keep Australia Beautiful’ by looking like this air brushed, headless model.

This ad reinforces a narrow standard of beauty and objectifies women. The message is that it is a woman’s duty to look a certain way for the benefit of others. It may as well say ‘Keep Australia Beautiful by looking hot in a bikini.’

Unfortunately complaints to the Advertising Standards Board against Vitaco have already been dismissed. You can read the PDF determinations here (billboard) and here (transport).

In its response to the ASB, the advertiser denied the ad was sexual in nature and claimed it was about promoting health:

… the intent of the advertisement is to communicate the aspiration image of a fit and healthy female physique in connection with the functional benefits of a protein bar. As such, we believe the content of the advertisement does not contravene the Code in relation to sex, sexuality and/or nudity and recommend the complaint to be dismissed.” (Bold ours).

In making its determination, the ASB

… noted that the model is clearly clothed in a bikini and the image used is viewed in connection with the text, making a clear association between the image of the woman and the product being advertised ie: a food product designed to assist with weight management and good health.

But the advertisement does not say ‘Keep Australia Healthy.’ It says ‘Keep Australia Beautiful.’ There is a difference which both the advertiser and the ASB have failed to recognise. ’Thin and beautiful’ as defined by our narrow cultural beauty standards does not necessarily mean ‘healthy.’ Similarly, those who don’t fit the narrow beauty standard ie. older and/or larger, are not necessarily ‘unhealthy.’ We cannot and should not presume to know someone’s health just by looking at them.

In addition to sexual objectification, the ad is misleading. The company has appropriated the name of a well known environmental organisation ‘Keep Australia Beautiful’, for its own benefit. ‘Keep Australia Beautiful’ is a long standing community based movement which aims to create a cleaner environment through the promotion of anti-litter campaigns. Some of the complaints to the ASB have demonstrated the connection people see between this slogan and the anti-litter campaigns.

The ad has nothing to do with “helping to keep Australia beautiful”. The ad is fake misleading advertising. It doesn’t have a rubbish bin or rubbish in the ad but a close up of a headless fake woman wearing a tiny bikini.

The woman in the ad is not picking up rubbish so what is the ad telling society?

Vitaco has completely ignored these concerns. It is a shame that the ASB has allowed the name of a well respected environmental organisation to be used in the objectification of women for profit.

Vitaco has combined the objectification of women with a well known environmental campaign slogan to market a diet product. It has done this under the thin veil of ‘health.’ We’re not buying it and neither should you.

Looking at this ad, we are reminded of a great quote posted on Spark Summit’s facebook page some time ago: “A two-step approach to having a ’beach body’: have a body, take it to the beach. How often the simple solutions elude us!”

Tell Vitaco what you think of its sexist ad campaign here.